Saturday, June 2, 2012

Mental Hand History


Mental Hand History (from Page 61 of The Mental Game of Poker):

1.       Describe the problem:

My mental game problem is a lack of focus.

Throughout the session I am constantly surfing the net (I play on a laptop). When surfing on the net, I often find I’m opening the same pages over and over again (Facebook, Pokernews, Gmail, NRL, DreamTeam).

When I am in this state, my ‘red line’ goes down at a slope that is larger than it tends to when I am playing well. And my green line tends to follow suit.

2.       Why does it make logical sense that you would react, think, or feel that way?

              A - There is downtime between hands; I should use it as multitasking is efficient.

              B – Most decisions are automated (unconscious competence) and with 15 act there’s no rush.

3.       Why is that logic flawed?

A – Multitasking is not always efficient, poker is something that has a positive correlation between attention and performance.

B – This game has incomplete info, the more information we can gain via observation of opponents, stats and self-awareness the better our performance.


4.       What is the correct way to handle the situation?

           A – There is always hands being played at your table, this is a good chance to pick up on ways to                  gain a greater edge on villains. (The in internet will still be there after my session is finished).

            B – A good game is a fast game (I play more hands therefore more profit, villains are less likely to leave table due to my slow play), I also get impatient when people are slow so I should not be the slow one.

5.       Why is that correction correct?

A – The greater my edge on my villains, the larger my win rate, the less variance I will see in my results. This will lead to a better chance of growing a decent bank roll in long run.

B – A good game is more enjoyable, the more fun at the table the more inclined I am to think deeper in situations.


In order to maximise my chance of achieving the situation of never considering opening my browser while playing I will…….
1 – Aim to make notes constantly.
2 – Regularly record myself playing with screencast-o-matic. And post them to be accountable.
3 – Review this post regularly, going over step 5 before each session.

Friday, June 1, 2012

AA** against shortstack


$10.00 USD PL Omaha - Friday, June 01, 12:54:19 ET 2012
Table Deal PLO 18  10 Max (Real Money)
Seat 3 is the button
Seat 1: Doggies ( $10.15 USD )
Seat 2: gizmo003 ( $3.62 USD )
Seat 3: ReverseEST ( $6.47 USD )
Seat 5: Chiinaboy ( $21.33 USD )
Seat 6: robom ( $3.82 USD )
Chiinaboy posts small blind [$0.05 USD].
robom posts big blind [$0.10 USD].
Dealt to Doggies [  Tc Ah Ad 9c ]
Doggies raises [$0.35 USD]
gizmo003 folds
ReverseEST folds
Chiinaboy folds
robom calls [$0.25 USD]

Pre flop standard, villain is 66/0 after 6 hands, so likely bad. We can only eliminate really trashy hands from his range.
** Dealing Flop ** [ Kc, 4c, 7d ]
SPR = Slightly over 4.

Somewhat connected board, one we are definitely going to c-bet for value and protection with our overpair  + T - high FD + Backdoor straight draw.

Given the SPR I should have potted here, pretty much all the stacks go in on turn and letting him draw cheap is bad, is we face a check raise we can get it in as we do not know that much about villain.

When villain calls, we can put him on straight draws pair + gutter/kickers/flush draws  and some flush draws.

robom checks
Doggies bets [$0.50 USD]
robom calls [$0.50 USD]
** Dealing Turn ** [ 5d ]
robom checks

Pot 1.75$, 2.97$ left behind.

The 5d adds a bunch of two pairs and draws. However given the SPR we have to make our decision if we are going with it here. When he checks we can rule out 86** a reasonable amount I think, 63** also probably leads. Sets are minimal as they check raise flop (or lead), so we have good equity against his range in general, and against a strong all in range we are roughly 26% at worst.
So we should bet pot here, if we can get him to fold his equity that’s awesome, and we are never getting it in drawing dead here often what so ever.

We can check and look to get to showdown but against what is likely a player who calls way to wide we need to get max value which is again a reason why we should be potting the river.

Doggies bets [$1.20 USD]
robom raises [$2.97 USD]

Gotta call 1.77$ to win 5.92$, so we have the odds to call against the range we give him.

Doggies calls [$1.77 USD]
Doggies shows [Tc, Ah Ad 9c ]
robom shows [Kh, 5h 5c Kd ]
** Dealing River ** [ Qh ]
robom wins $7.31 USD from main pot

So he turned up with a hand we did not think was in his range, and against that hand we are 20%. That’s okay, we just need to take a note down and we can use that in the future. Our mistake was not potting on either street. When I first played the hand I was thinking the turn call may be bad, but the stack sizes make it a he mistake if we fold.
How did he play it? He didn’t play it horribly but I think he should lead out on the flop or at least CR as his hand is vulnerable.